RegistryCompare › A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol vs Composio

A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol vs Composio

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol and Composio, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol leads on trust — 89.0/100 (Grade A) vs 76.2/100 (Grade B), a 12.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal A2A / Agent2Agent Protocolgoogle/A2A Composiocomposiohq/composio
HVTrust score 89.0 76.2
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade A A
Overall rank #23 #190
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #1 #9
GitHub stars 25.7k 30.1k
Last updated 5d ago today
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 7.0 / 10 7.8 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 2.1M/wk 42k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 21.2 12.7
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 14.4 15.1
Maintenance / 20 17.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 19.0 16.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface extensions plugins
Provenance drift Unknown Partial
Open in the live compare tool → A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol profile Composio profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →