RegistryCompare › A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol vs Composio

A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol vs Composio

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol and Composio, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol leads on trust — 88.7/100 (Grade A) vs 75.9/100 (Grade B), a 12.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal A2A / Agent2Agent Protocolgoogle/A2A Composiocomposiohq/composio
HVTrust score 88.7 75.9
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade A A
Overall rank #12 #72
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #1 #5
GitHub stars 25.0k 29.4k
Last updated 3d ago 1d ago
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 7.0 / 10 7.1 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 2.6M/wk 103k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 21.2 13.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 14.4 14.5
Maintenance / 20 16.6 19.9
Adoption / 20 19.1 17.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Unknown Partial
Open in the live compare tool → A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol profile Composio profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →