RegistryCompare › A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol vs Chrome DevTools MCP

A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol vs Chrome DevTools MCP

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol and Chrome DevTools MCP, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol leads on trust — 88.9/100 (Grade A) vs 73.9/100 (Grade B), a 15.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal A2A / Agent2Agent Protocolgoogle/A2A Chrome DevTools MCPChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp
HVTrust score 88.9 73.9
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade A C
Overall rank #22 #95
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #1 #8
GitHub stars 25.9k 52.4k
Last updated 5d ago today
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 7.1 / 10 8.3 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 2.5M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 21.3 15.4
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 14.5 15.6
Maintenance / 20 16.6 19.9
Adoption / 20 19.1 11.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 2 — Anthropic, Google Gemini
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface extensions plugins
Provenance drift Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol profile Chrome DevTools MCP profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →