RegistryCompare › A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol vs Chrome DevTools MCP

A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol vs Chrome DevTools MCP

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol and Chrome DevTools MCP, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol leads on trust — 89.3/100 (Grade A) vs 70.9/100 (Grade B), a 18.4-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal A2A / Agent2Agent Protocolgoogle/A2A Chrome DevTools MCPChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp
HVTrust score 89.3 70.9
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade A C
Overall rank #13 #99
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #2 #8
GitHub stars 25.2k 48.5k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 7.0 / 10 7.7 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 2.6M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 21.2 14.6
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 14.4 15.0
Maintenance / 20 17.2 19.7
Adoption / 20 19.1 11.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 2 — Google Gemini, OpenAI
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins marketplace
Provenance drift Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol profile Chrome DevTools MCP profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →