Compare

Compare up to three agents side-by-side. The report below highlights trust leaders, biggest gaps, public signal differences, and category-specific strengths so you can scan the tradeoffs without hopping across profile pages.
What is compared: HVTrust score, health score, evidence grade, the five trust dimensions, freshness, stars, weekly downloads, 4-week commits, signed commits, OSSF Scorecard, build provenance, and a separate AI-agent-surface snapshot.
Saved watchlist Keep up to 12 agents saved in this browser and preload up to 3 into compare.

Decision summary

Quick visual scan

Three compact overlays: trust shape, ecosystem traction, and verification posture. Use this for fast pattern recognition before reading the detailed rows.

Comparison matrix

Compact side-by-side scoring. Green cells indicate the current leader for that metric. For ranks and freshness, lower is better.

Profile context only

AI agent surface

Separate from HVTrust. This compares MCP, service dependencies, tool surface, and package-source alignment without mixing them into the production trust rank.

How to read the gap

Short guidance for what actually matters when the numbers diverge.

Agent snapshots

Quick profile cards for context, links, and a few top-level signals without leaving compare.

Pick agents to compare

Start typing a project name above. The page becomes much more useful with two or three agents because the report can then call out where one clearly leads, where another is safer, and where the spread is basically noise.