← Blog
Protocols & Tool Integration comparison

Best Open-Source Protocols & Tool Integration: A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol vs MCP Registry

A data-backed comparison of the top two protocols & tool integration on HVTracker, built from public trust signals rather than stars alone.

May 30, 2026 · 4 min read · Data updated 2026-05-30 20:03 UTC

Short answer: A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol currently leads MCP Registry on HVTracker's evidence-weighted trust score: 87.5 vs 67.1/100. This is not a popularity ranking; it combines supply-chain safety, identity/provenance, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol

87.5
#13 overall · #1 in Protocols & Tool Integration · Grade B

Agent2Agent (A2A) is an open protocol enabling communication and interoperability between opaque agentic applications.

Repositorygoogle/A2A
Stars24.1k
Last push2026-05-29
Weekly commits10
Weekly downloads2,559,636

MCP Registry

67.1
#61 overall · #2 in Protocols & Tool Integration · Grade C

A community driven registry service for Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers.

Repositorymodelcontextprotocol/registry
Stars6.9k
Last push2026-05-28
Weekly commits37
Weekly downloads

A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol vs MCP Registry: trust signal breakdown

Both projects are tracked in the Protocols & Tool Integration category, but they do not expose the same evidence. The table below compares the public signals that feed HVTrust.

SignalA2A / Agent2Agent ProtocolMCP Registry
HVTrust score87.567.1
Safety / Integrity25.1/3015.8/30
Identity / Provenance20.0/2012.0/20
Transparency16.8/2016.5/20
Maintenance16.1/2018.2/20
Adoption9.5/104.6/10
OSSF Scorecard6.86.5
Signed commits99%100%
Package provenanceVerifiedNot detected

Which one should you evaluate first?

If your priority is the most verifiable trust profile today, start with A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol. It has the stronger current HVTrust score and ranks higher in Protocols & Tool Integration. If your use case depends on a specific runtime, language, license, or integration model, use the individual profiles rather than the headline score alone.

For production use, the practical checklist is: inspect the security policy, confirm package provenance or release signing where available, review recent maintenance cadence, and compare the exact trust breakdown. HVTracker is meant to reduce the first-pass research burden, not replace your own risk review.