updated 2026-09-18 13:03 UTC

zeroshot

the-open-engine/zeroshot

Independent executor–verifier orchestration for software changes.

Coding Agents Rust Grade C Listed MIT
63.2/100
Rank #511 of 1328
Compare zeroshot

How does it stack up against its Coding Agents neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-09-18 · 0d ago
Recent change
Rank +1

Is zeroshot safe? zeroshot scores 63.2/100 (Grade C), ranked #511 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.6/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-18. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Coding Agents

#24 DeepSeek-Reasonix — 63.9 (C) → #25 GitHub Copilot CLI — 63.7 (C) → #27 oh-my-openagent — 62.9 (C) → #28 Nanocoder — 61.9 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-15
Rank Moved
Rank rose 72 spots (#587 → #515)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#558 → #584)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#540 → #551)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for zeroshot View Coding Agents Report missing data
77.8
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#26
In Coding Agents

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-18 13:03 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-18

Activity & Reach

Stars
1.8k
Forks
171
Last Push
2026-09-18
today
Commits (4 wk)
66
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
62
Rank Change
▲2
was #513

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Coding Agents

63.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

zeroshot Coding Agents average (72 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
12.0 / 25
3.0 above avg 9.0
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
1.0 below avg 11.8
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.3 / 17
1.5 above avg 11.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.3 / 20
4.4 above avg 14.9
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.8 / 20
4.4 below avg 12.2

Activity Inputs

77.8 / 100
StarsRepository reach
19.6 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
22.8 / 25
CommunityFork signal
10.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
5.6 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 18, 2026
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 4
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 6
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 5
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 6

Is zeroshot safe?

zeroshot has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does zeroshot publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for zeroshot. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does zeroshot have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
zeroshot has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is zeroshot actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does zeroshot use?
zeroshot ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are zeroshot's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to zeroshot are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to zeroshot's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-03
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI

Maintain zeroshot?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores zeroshot from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 19Listed 1HVTrust 1Grade 1Scorecard 1Surface 1
2026-09-15
Rank Moved
Rank rose 72 spots (#587 → #515)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#558 → #584)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#540 → #551)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#508 → #540)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 74 spots (#425 → #499)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#415 → #425)
2026-09-03
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#407 → #423)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#393 → #407)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#363 → #393)
2026-08-29
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.6/10
2026-08-29
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 640 spots (#1009 → #369)
2026-08-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 35.6pts (25.0 → 60.6)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#974 → #1009)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#949 → #974)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 106 spots (#843 → #949)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#845 → #835)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#832 → #849)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#820 → #830)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#831 → #820)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 46 spots (#785 → #831)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 337 spots (#445 → #782)
2026-08-03
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #423
GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 63.2 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/zeroshot.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/zeroshot)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/zeroshot"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/zeroshot.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Coding Agents

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON