Vercel fx

Unix like coding agent

Coding Agents Zig Grade D Listed Apache-2.0
26.2/100
Rank #1189 of 1320
Compare Vercel fx

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade D · 1/5 signals
Last push
2026-09-02 · 0d ago
Recent change
New

Is Vercel fx safe? Vercel fx scores 26.2/100 (Grade D), ranked #1189 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-02. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Coding Agents

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-09-02
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1189
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
82.2
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#67

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-02 15:03 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Activity & Reach

Stars
2.7k
Forks
309
Last Push
2026-09-02
today
Commits (4 wk)
1233
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
55
Rank Change
NEW

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Coding Agents

26.2 / 100 · 50.0% confidence

Vercel fx Coding Agents average (72 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
5.0 / 25
3.2 below avg 8.2
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.8 below avg 11.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
3.0 below avg 11.5
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
20.0 / 20
5.2 above avg 14.8
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
8.2 / 20
4.1 below avg 12.3

Activity Inputs

82.2 / 100
StarsRepository reach
20.6 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
11.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
Not available
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified

Is Vercel fx safe?

Public trust evidence for Vercel fx is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Vercel fx publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Vercel fx. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Vercel fx have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for Vercel fx. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is Vercel fx actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Vercel fx use?
Vercel fx ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Vercel fx's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to Vercel fx are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Vercel fx?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Vercel fx from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Listed 1
2026-09-02
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1189

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 26.2 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/vercel-fx.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/vercel-fx)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/vercel-fx"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/vercel-fx.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Coding Agents

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON