UI-TARS

Pioneering Automated GUI Interaction with Native Agents

Browser & Computer Use Python Grade D Listed Apache-2.0
Compare → Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
HVTrust
40.0/100 · Grade D
Evidence coverage
Grade A · 4/5 signals
Last push
2026-01-27 · 165d ago
Recent change
Provider Removed

Is UI-TARS safe? UI-TARS scores 40.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #282 of 328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.7/10; 19% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-01-27. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Quick Trust Read

Verdict
Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
40.0/100 · Grade D
Strongest Signal
Adoption
13.4/20
Weakest Signal
Maintenance
1.0/20
What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-07-04
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: OpenAI
2026-06-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#237 → #271)
2026-06-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#219 → #237)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 2.7/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 165 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
40.0
Activity Score · out of 100
40.0
HVTrust Score · out of 100
#282
Global Rank · of 328
#15

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-07-11 06:04 UTC · Repo last pushed 165 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-07-05 2026-07-11

Activity & Reach

Stars
11.2k
Forks
846
Last Push
2026-01-27
165 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
564
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
1
Open Issues
43
Rank Change
=
was #282

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions

40.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence
Safety / IntegrityOSSF, provenance, signatures
4.3 / 25
Identity / ProvenanceListing and build link
10.8 / 18
TransparencyLicense and public checks
10.8 / 17
MaintenanceFreshness and commits
1.0 / 20
AdoptionStars and downloads
13.4 / 20

Activity Inputs

40.0 / 100
StarsRepository reach
24.3 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
2.1 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
13.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
2.7 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Jul 11, 2026
Signed Commits
19%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 0
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 1
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 2

Is UI-TARS safe?

Public trust evidence for UI-TARS is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does UI-TARS publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for UI-TARS. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does UI-TARS have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
UI-TARS has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.7/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is UI-TARS actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 165 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does UI-TARS use?
UI-TARS ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are UI-TARS's commits signed?
19% of the last 100 commits to UI-TARS are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Ranked neighbours in Browser & Computer Use

AI agent surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
medium confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to UI-TARS's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-07-04
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: OpenAI
2026-06-05
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-06-05
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: OpenAI

Maintain UI-TARS?

HVTrust scores UI-TARS from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Rank 8HVTrust 2Grade 1Scorecard 1Surface 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-07-04
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: OpenAI
2026-06-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#237 → #271)
2026-06-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#219 → #237)
2026-06-22
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#209 → #219)
2026-06-21
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#195 → #209)
2026-06-18
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#175 → #187)
2026-06-05
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-06-05
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: OpenAI
2026-06-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#144 → #156)
2026-06-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#127 → #144)
2026-05-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 10.0pts (31.8 → 41.8)
2026-05-27
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.1/10
2026-05-27
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-05-27
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 3.4pts (37.1 → 33.7)
2026-05-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 57 spots (#81 → #138)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

HVTrust 40.0 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/ui-tars.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/ui-tars)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/ui-tars"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/ui-tars.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Browser & Computer Use

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON