updated 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC

Tura

Tura-AI/tura

Build agent that uses 80% less token and delivers better results.

Coding Agents Rust Grade D Listed AGPL-3.0
36.0/100
Rank #684 of 1283
Compare Tura

How does it stack up against its Coding Agents neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-12 · 0d ago
Recent change
New

Is Tura safe? Tura scores 36.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #684 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 21% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-12. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Coding Agents

#50 Whale — 37.6 (D) → #51 Devika — 36.2 (D) → #53 Continue — 34.6 (D) → #54 PearAI — 33.3 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-08-10
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #692
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Tura View Coding Agents Report missing data
70.1
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#52
In Coding Agents

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars
566
Forks
29
Last Push
2026-08-12
today
Commits (4 wk)
54
Downloads (7d)
86
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
3
Rank Change
▲2
was #686

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Coding Agents

36.0 / 100 · 67.0% confidence

Tura Coding Agents average (67 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
1.0 / 25
6.7 below avg 7.7
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.9 below avg 11.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
2.6 below avg 11.1
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
18.9 / 20
3.7 above avg 15.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.2 / 20
3.0 below avg 12.2

Activity Inputs

70.1 / 100
StarsRepository reach
16.5 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
21.7 / 25
CommunityFork signal
6.9 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
21%
of last 100 commits verified

Is Tura safe?

Public trust evidence for Tura is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Tura publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Tura. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Tura have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for Tura. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is Tura actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Tura use?
Tura ships under AGPL-3.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Tura's commits signed?
20% of the last 100 commits to Tura are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
medium confidence
1 tags
Broad capability areas detected.
  • browser
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Tura?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Tura from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Listed 1
2026-08-10
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #692
GitHub → npm: tura-ai

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 36.0 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/tura.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/tura)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/tura"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/tura.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Coding Agents

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON