Potpie

Context Graph for AI Native SDLC

Coding Agents Python Grade D Listed Apache-2.0
Compare → Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
HVTrust
24.4/100 · Grade D
Evidence coverage
Grade D · 1/5 signals
Last push
2026-07-13 · 0d ago
Recent change
New

Is Potpie safe? Potpie scores 24.4/100 (Grade D), ranked #360 of 371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-13. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Quick Trust Read

Verdict
Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
24.4/100 · Grade D
Strongest Signal
Maintenance
19.3/20
Weakest Signal
Safety / Integrity
5.0/25
What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-07-13
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #360
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
83.4
Activity Score · out of 100
24.4
HVTrust Score · out of 100
#360
Global Rank · of 371
#46

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-07-13 10:30 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Activity & Reach

Stars
5.5k
Forks
641
Last Push
2026-07-13
today
Commits (4 wk)
67
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
30
Rank Change
NEW

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions

24.4 / 100 · 50.0% confidence
Safety / IntegrityOSSF, provenance, signatures
5.0 / 25
Identity / ProvenanceListing and build link
10.8 / 18
TransparencyLicense and public checks
8.5 / 17
MaintenanceFreshness and commits
19.3 / 20
AdoptionStars and downloads
9.0 / 20

Activity Inputs

83.4 / 100
StarsRepository reach
22.4 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
22.9 / 25
CommunityFork signal
13.1 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
Not available
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified

Is Potpie safe?

Public trust evidence for Potpie is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Potpie publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Potpie. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Potpie have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for Potpie. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is Potpie actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Potpie use?
Potpie ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Potpie's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to Potpie are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Ranked neighbours in Coding Agents

AI agent surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Potpie appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
7 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
  • code
  • database
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Potpie?

HVTrust scores Potpie from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Listed 1
2026-07-13
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #360

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

HVTrust 24.4 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/potpie.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/potpie)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/potpie"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/potpie.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Coding Agents

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON