OpenAI CUA Sample App

Learn how to use CUA (our Computer Using Agent) via the API on multiple computer environments.

Browser & Computer Use TypeScript Grade C Listed MIT
56.0/100
Rank #730 of 1328
Compare OpenAI CUA Sample App

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-09-04 · 16d ago
Recent change
No recent signal change

Is OpenAI CUA Sample App safe? OpenAI CUA Sample App scores 56.0/100 (Grade C), ranked #730 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.5/10; 36% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-04. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Browser & Computer Use

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#704 → #716)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank rose 181 spots (#876 → #695)
2026-09-09
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 5.9pts (50.8 → 56.7)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
71.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#21

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-20 16:11 UTC · Repo last pushed 16 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-20

Activity & Reach

Stars
1.9k
Forks
429
Last Push
2026-09-04
16 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
23
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
23
Rank Change
▼1
was #729

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Browser & Computer Use

56.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

OpenAI CUA Sample App Browser & Computer Use average (42 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
8.7 / 25
0.9 below avg 9.6
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
1.5 below avg 12.3
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.2 / 17
1.3 above avg 11.9
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
16.4 / 20
3.2 above avg 13.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.9 / 20
3.4 below avg 11.3

Activity Inputs

71.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
19.6 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
22.8 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
17.2 / 25
CommunityFork signal
12.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
5.5 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 18, 2026
Signed Commits
36%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 5
CI-Tests 3
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 8
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 10
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 10
Vulnerabilities 0

Is OpenAI CUA Sample App safe?

OpenAI CUA Sample App has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does OpenAI CUA Sample App publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for OpenAI CUA Sample App. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does OpenAI CUA Sample App have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
OpenAI CUA Sample App has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is OpenAI CUA Sample App actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 16 days ago.
What license does OpenAI CUA Sample App use?
OpenAI CUA Sample App ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are OpenAI CUA Sample App's commits signed?
36% of the last 100 commits to OpenAI CUA Sample App are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to OpenAI CUA Sample App's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-05
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: OpenAI
2026-09-04
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: OpenAI
2026-09-03
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed
2026-06-28
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days

Maintain OpenAI CUA Sample App?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores OpenAI CUA Sample App from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 24HVTrust 3Score 2Scorecard 1Stale 1Fresh 1Grade 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#704 → #716)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank rose 181 spots (#876 → #695)
2026-09-09
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 5.9pts (50.8 → 56.7)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#863 → #876)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 39 spots (#824 → #863)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#811 → #824)
2026-09-05
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: OpenAI
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 93 spots (#718 → #811)
2026-09-04
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: OpenAI
2026-09-04
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank rose 49 spots (#767 → #718)
2026-09-04
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 7pts (67 → 74)
2026-09-03
Activity Resumed
Activity resumed
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 307 spots (#1074 → #767)
2026-09-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 13.8pts (35.5 → 49.3)
2026-09-03
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 32pts (35 → 67)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 47 spots (#1027 → #1074)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 40 spots (#987 → #1027)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#952 → #987)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 46 spots (#906 → #952)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 49 spots (#857 → #906)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#828 → #857)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#804 → #828)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 102 spots (#702 → #804)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#672 → #685)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#640 → #670)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 236 spots (#402 → #638)
2026-07-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#377 → #387)
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#343 → #367)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#324 → #343)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#288 → #324)
2026-06-28
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days
2026-06-24
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 2.7/10
2026-06-24
Rank Moved
Rank rose 22 spots (#299 → #277)
2026-06-24
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 23.6pts (17.9 → 41.5)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 56.0 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/openai-cua-sample-app.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/openai-cua-sample-app)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/openai-cua-sample-app"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/openai-cua-sample-app.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Browser & Computer Use

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON