Open Operator

A template for building web agents with Stagehand on Browserbase

Browser & Computer Use TypeScript Needs review Unlicensed

Is Open Operator safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 2.4 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 23%
Last push 158d ago
Compare Open Operator

How does it stack up against its Browser & Computer Use neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: Open Operator scores 24.1/100 (Grade D), ranked #1332 of 1371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.4/10; 23% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-05-04. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Open Operator could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Active listing, but review is needed
  • [4.1.1] no declared license (GitHub license field is null)

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Open Operator and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Partly signed

    github.com/browserbase/open-operator, last pushed 2026-05-04. 23% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Weak

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 2.4/10 (scanned Oct 3, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review4
    • Branch Protection5
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflown/a
    • Token Permissionsn/a
    • Pinned Dependenciesn/a
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 5
    CI-Tests 0
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 4
    Contributors 10
    Dangerous-Workflow -1
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 0
    Maintained 0
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies -1
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 0
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions -1
    Vulnerabilities 0
  3. Published packages None

    No registry package. Open Operator is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

No change to package provenance, package source links, Scorecard coverage or license in HVTracker's daily snapshots of Open Operator.

Evidence behind this score

Coverage B: 3 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads (missing)
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues Open Operator’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How Open Operator compares in Browser & Computer Use

  1. #40 ScaleCUA 30.0 +5.9
  2. #41 PyWinAssistant 29.5 +5.4
  3. #42 Open Operator 24.1 this agent
  4. #43 TuriX 19.7 −4.4
  5. #44 sim-use 0.0 −24.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Open Operator’s 24.1.

Where the 24.1 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Browser & Computer Use average

24.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Open Operator Browser & Computer Use average (45 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
4.2 / 25
5.1 below avg 9.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
1.6 below avg 12.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
2.0 / 17
9.4 below avg 11.4
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
1.5 / 20
10.7 below avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.9 / 20
2.8 below avg 10.7

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 327 spots (#984 → #1311)
2026-09-22
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 553 spots (#431 → #984)
2026-09-21
Rank Moved
Rank rose 878 spots (#1309 → #431)
Maintainer Checklist
Declare an open license Publish a clear OSI-approved license so usage and maintenance terms are independently verifiable.
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 2.4/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Review Flags
[4.1.1] no declared license (GitHub license field is null)
34.6
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#42

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-09 08:15 UTC · Repo last pushed 158 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-09

Activity & Reach

Stars
2.0k
Forks
323
Last Push
2026-05-04
158 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
0
Open Issues
14
Rank Change
=
was #1332

Analysis

Activity Inputs

34.6 / 100
StarsRepository reach
19.7 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
3.1 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
11.7 / 20

Common questions about Open Operator

Public trust evidence for Open Operator is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Open Operator publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Open Operator. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Open Operator have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Open Operator has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.4/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Open Operator actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 158 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does Open Operator use?
Open Operator ships under no SPDX license detected. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Open Operator's commits signed?
23% of the last 100 commits to Open Operator are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
3 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
1 tags
Broad capability areas detected.
  • browser
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Open Operator's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-02
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days

Maintain Open Operator?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Open Operator from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 23Stale 1
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 327 spots (#984 → #1311)
2026-09-22
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 553 spots (#431 → #984)
2026-09-21
Rank Moved
Rank rose 878 spots (#1309 → #431)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#1267 → #1279)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#1253 → #1267)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#1236 → #1253)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 38 spots (#1198 → #1236)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#1162 → #1198)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 45 spots (#1117 → #1162)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#1088 → #1117)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 48 spots (#1040 → #1088)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 52 spots (#988 → #1040)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 37 spots (#951 → #988)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#924 → #951)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 113 spots (#811 → #924)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#791 → #806)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#778 → #788)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 42 spots (#744 → #786)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 314 spots (#426 → #740)
2026-08-02
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days
2026-07-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#406 → #417)
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#372 → #395)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#351 → #372)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#315 → #351)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 24.1 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/open-operator.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/open-operator)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/open-operator"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/open-operator.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Browser & Computer Use

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON