MiMo Code
MiMo Code: Where Models and Agents Co-Evolve
Is MiMo Code safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare MiMo Code
How does it stack up against its Coding Agents neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: MiMo Code scores 25.2/100 (Grade D), ranked #1326 of 1343 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 71% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-29. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How MiMo Code could raise its score
Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.
- Raise the OSSF Scorecard to 9.0no OSSF Scorecard result yet +45.3 → 70.5 B · #18 of 75
- Sign every commit71% signed today +0.8 → 26.0 D · #73 of 75
How MiMo Code compares in Coding Agents
- #71 typedai 27.1 +1.9
- #72 Devika 26.2 +1.0
- #73 MiMo Code 25.2 this agent
- #74 Kodu 19.6 −5.6
- #75 ZCode 19.6 −5.6
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MiMo Code’s 25.2.
Where the 25.2 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the Coding Agents average
25.2 / 100 · 50.0% confidenceMiMo Code Coding Agents average (75 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
89.4 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about MiMo Code
Does MiMo Code publish package provenance?
Does MiMo Code have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is MiMo Code actively maintained?
What license does MiMo Code use?
Are MiMo Code's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- code
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Maintain MiMo Code?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores MiMo Code from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mimo-code)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mimo-code"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mimo-code.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Coding Agents
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON