How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Full methodology →
Signals refreshed2026-06-04 00:07 UTC·Repo last pushed 2 days ago
Rank Trend
2026-06-022026-06-03
Activity & Reach
Stars
34.8k
Forks
2.9k
Last Push
2026-06-02
2 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
56
Downloads (7d)
1,476,919
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
74
Open Issues
526
Rank Change
=
was #149
Analysis
HVTrust Dimensions
46.7 / 100 · 75.0% confidence
Safety / IntegrityOSSF, provenance, signatures
4.9 / 25
Identity / ProvenanceListing and build link
10.8 / 18
TransparencyLicense and public checks
8.5 / 17
MaintenanceFreshness and commits
18.9 / 20
AdoptionStars and downloads
19.1 / 20
Activity Inputs
90.2 / 100
StarsRepository reach
27.2 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.7 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
21.9 / 25
CommunityFork signal
16.1 / 20
Supply Chain Trust
Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
98%
of last 100 commits verified
Is DSPy safe?
Public trust evidence for DSPy is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does DSPy publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for DSPy. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does DSPy have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for DSPy. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is DSPy actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 2 day(s).
What license does DSPy use?
DSPy ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are DSPy's commits signed?
98% of the last 100 commits to DSPy are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
Runtime trust — coming soon
HVTrust currently scores supply-chain signals. We're adding runtime trust next: what an agent actually does when it runs — what it can reach, which tools it carries, what external services it depends on. Track progress on the roadmap →
MCP support
Tool / plugin surface
External service deps
Package provenance drift
Maintain DSPy?
HVTrust scores DSPy from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
