Is Antigravity CLI safe?
Antigravity CLI scores 38.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #370 of 418 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types).
The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found;
OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.5/10;
14% of recent commits are signed;
last pushed 2026-07-18. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
Tracking note
This GitHub repository is a public issue tracker for Antigravity, a closed-source product — it does not contain the product's source code. The OpenSSF Scorecard and license signals below describe that issue-tracker repo, not the shipped product.
Quick Trust Read
Verdict
Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
38.0/100 · Grade D
Strongest Signal
Maintenance
14.2/20
Weakest Signal
Transparency
2.1/17
What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#347 → #372)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 19 spots (#328 → #347)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 34 spots (#294 → #328)
Maintainer Checklist
Declare an open licensePublish a clear OSI-approved license so usage and maintenance terms are independently verifiable.
Raise Scorecard signalsCurrent OSSF Scorecard is 2.5/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenanceAdd package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commitsRaise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Signals refreshed2026-07-19 12:00 UTC·Repo last pushed yesterday
Proprietary software. A lower HVTrust score reflects fewer public supply-chain artifacts (open license, build provenance, signed commits) — not a security finding. Antigravity CLI may have internal security practices not visible through public signals.
Public trust evidence for Antigravity CLI is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Antigravity CLI publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Antigravity CLI. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Antigravity CLI have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Antigravity CLI has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Antigravity CLI actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Antigravity CLI use?
Antigravity CLI ships under no SPDX license detected. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Antigravity CLI's commits signed?
14% of the last 100 commits to Antigravity CLI are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal:
No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
shell
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed
Detected changes to Antigravity CLI's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
HVTrust scores Antigravity CLI from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON
