How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Full methodology →
Signals refreshed2026-06-04 00:07 UTC·Repo last pushed yesterday
Rank Trend
2026-06-012026-06-03
Activity & Reach
Stars
3.8k
Forks
535
Last Push
2026-06-03
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
841
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
38
Rank Change
▼2
was #72
Analysis
HVTrust Dimensions
68.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidence
Safety / IntegrityOSSF, provenance, signatures
14.3 / 25
Identity / ProvenanceListing and build link
10.8 / 18
TransparencyLicense and public checks
14.8 / 17
MaintenanceFreshness and commits
19.9 / 20
AdoptionStars and downloads
8.6 / 20
Activity Inputs
84.2 / 100
StarsRepository reach
21.5 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
12.7 / 20
Supply Chain Trust
Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
7.4 / 10
via deps.dev · OpenSSF
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Dependency-Update-Tool10
Code-Review4
Security-Policy10
Maintained10
Dangerous-Workflow10
Token-Permissions10
Binary-Artifacts10
CII-Best-Practices5
Pinned-Dependencies5
License10
SAST9
Fuzzing10
Signed-Releases0
Packaging10
Branch-Protection5
Vulnerabilities0
CI-Tests10
Contributors10
Is Agent Governance Toolkit safe?
Agent Governance Toolkit has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Agent Governance Toolkit publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Agent Governance Toolkit. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Agent Governance Toolkit have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Agent Governance Toolkit has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.4/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Agent Governance Toolkit actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Agent Governance Toolkit use?
Agent Governance Toolkit ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Agent Governance Toolkit's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to Agent Governance Toolkit are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
Runtime trust — coming soon
HVTrust currently scores supply-chain signals. We're adding runtime trust next: what an agent actually does when it runs — what it can reach, which tools it carries, what external services it depends on. Track progress on the roadmap →
MCP support
Tool / plugin surface
External service deps
Package provenance drift
Maintain Agent Governance Toolkit?
HVTrust scores Agent Governance Toolkit from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OSSF Scorecard via deps.dev
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v3.1 · Raw JSON
